(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up a Michigan citizens-only voting proposal, just hours after the state Supreme Court denied a petition also seeking to force the initiative onto the ballot.
Those decisions effectively doomed the initiative’s chances of appearing on the November ballot, as Friday is the day Michigan’s ballot will be finalized by the state Board of State Canvassers.
Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied the petition’s request on Thursday without explanation.
The denial came after he heard from both the plaintiffs and the defendants: The Michigan Board of State Canvassers, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and Director of Elections Jonathan Brater.
“We are deeply disappointed by today’s decision, particularly for the nearly 710,000 Michigan citizens who put their names on this petition believing they would have an opportunity to vote on it,” said campaign spokesperson Kristin Combs. “We fought until the very last possible moment because those people deserved to have their voices heard. We are enormously grateful to every signer, volunteer, donor and supporter who stood with us throughout this fight.”
Just last week, the Michigan Board of State Canvassers tied in two votes regarding the Americans for Citizen Voting-Michigan ballot initiative. Both votes were along party lines – with Republicans supporting the proposal and Democrats opposing.
That deadlock prevented the petition from appearing on the ballot without legal action.
The ballot initiative would have added language to Michigan’s Constitution stating that only U.S. citizens can vote, required a regular review of the voter rolls, and required photo identification for voters.
Groups submitted more than 700,000 signatures to the state in March, far more than the 446,198 valid signatures required to get on the ballot. To approve the initiative for the ballot, the state Bureau of Elections considered a sample of 1,000 of the signatures.
Of those 1,000, 629 needed to be proven valid for the initiative to move forward. The Bureau of Elections found only 612 of the 1,000 valid. A similar review by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers found 626 of 1,000 to be valid, meaning it was short three votes.
The bureau recommended the board deem the submitted signatures insufficient.
The initiative had until Sept. 2 to file an appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court. It did that last week, but decided to go to the U.S. Supreme Court after no action from the state court.
“The Michigan supremes sat on it,” a spokesperson for the initiative told supporters last week. “Outrageous. So we felt we had no chance.”
In previous disputes, Michigan ballot proposals had successfully sought relief from the state Supreme Court. This was the first initiative in recent state history to take its urgent ballot-access fight to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Absentee ballots in Michigan begin to go out in 20 days.
(The Center Square) - The Colorado River’s Upper Basin states are not required to make mandatory water cuts that the federal government imposed on the Lower Basin.
(The Center Square) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday halted a challenge to political parties seeking access to cheaper TV ads as a sprint toward the midterm elections commences.
(The Center Square) – A coalition of 17 states, lawmakers and advocacy organizations has filed 12 friend-of-the-court briefs urging the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold that parents and teachers have constitutional rights to know about their children despite public school gender policies.
Elyse Apel, a graduate of Hillsdale College, is a reporter for The Center Square covering Minnesota and Michigan. Her work has appeared in a range of national outlets, including the Washington Examiner, The American Spectator, and The Daily Wire.
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism
that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness
accounts, the history behind an article.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Post a comment as Guest
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.